The Blogging of Cantrell 994
Subtitle
Blog
Breaking The Decentralized Storage Hardship, EpiK Takes A different Pace
|
|
As the new decentralized storage mission these days, Filecoin undoubtedly results in the future change of storage. The first part of Filecoin house race is over and there was the sound of Filecoin fork. Compared with business cloud storage, decentralized storage as a new thing faces challenges similar to safety and reward distribution. Standing on the shoulders of giants, EpiK distributed information graph storage also faces a sequence of difficulties. But Epik discovered a unique solution to take a decentralized storage path that belongs to the information graph.
How does EpiK get out of the centralized storage dilemma, and the way does it differ from Filecoin? Next up for you to find out.
EpiK outperforms Filecoin in terms of working mode, key options, cost, safety, and privateness safety, and is extra sensible and easier to implement than Filecoin guidelines.
A. Different operation modes: P2P vs E2P
Filecoin is a P2P model, meaning individuals can upload knowledge at will and focuses on the P2P cloud storage market.
EpiK is an E2P model that enables only voted consultants in the field to upload information, specializing in the E2P cloud knowledge graph storage market.
B. Filecoin costs more
Filecoin storage is 10 times costlier than business-grade cloud storage, which is uneconomical; the added value of the EpiK Protocol knowledge graph will increase exponentially with knowledge density, which is sufficient to compensate for the excessive storage prices, which is economical.
C. Filecoin is more affected by forex worth, much less stable
The availability of Filecoin storage is significantly affected by the FIL foreign money price and is risky.
The EpiK Protocol knowledge graph knowledge storage market doesn't require miners to grab orders in actual time, and miners can select to save a duplicate of each data uploaded by area experts at any time to realize computing power.
D. Filecoin is sluggish to download and has poor usability.
In terms of download bandwidth, Filecoin is lower than one p.c of commercial-grade cloud storage and is not sensible; EpiK Protocol data graphs are listed by information gateways and provided to end-users, which is sensible and does not require excessive downlink bandwidth.
There is no such thing as a substitute for EpiK when it comes to security and privateness protection.
The privateness of Filecoin storage is definitely achieved with the assistance of cryptography in centralized cloud storage and isn't irreplaceable.
Epik Protocol are well documented and undeniably untameable on the chain, eliminating the potential of malicious manipulation of the data graph, and are irreplaceable in today’s and tomorrow’s period of intelligence where massive AI devices will need access to the data graph.
In terms of hardware thresholds, Filecoin and EpiK differ when it comes to their necessities for computing energy and information high quality.
A. Different computing energy thresholds
Filecoin requires a minimum of 1T computing power to block, but EpiK allows any miner with computing power better than 0 to take part in blocking without prior disk filling, and bizarre miners can be a part of at any time.
B. Different computing energy consumption
Filecoin Most users’ actual files are much smaller than 32GB, each Sector Size is ready to 32GB, which is a waste of house and consumes a variety of computing energy to generate proofs, elevating the hardware threshold.
EpiK Protocol A lot of the knowledge graph data are small information, and reducing the Sector Size to 8M makes better use of resources and likewise reduces the price of producing Post for miners and lowers the hardware threshold.
C. Different data quality checks
Filecoin has no management over knowledge high quality and generates extra meaningless information.
EpiK Protocol depends on community-voted domain experts to manage the standard of the data graph knowledge, giving miners enough time to participate in mining while updating their own equipment as the info scales, reducing the hardware barrier to entry.
The two have completely different enterprise fashions and totally different forms of storage, and thus additionally differ considerably in terms of advantages, penalty mechanisms, and ranges of participation. Compared, EpiK is more humane and cheap in design.
How does EpiK get out of the centralized storage dilemma, and the way does it differ from Filecoin? Next up for you to find out.
EpiK outperforms Filecoin in terms of working mode, key options, cost, safety, and privateness safety, and is extra sensible and easier to implement than Filecoin guidelines.
A. Different operation modes: P2P vs E2P
Filecoin is a P2P model, meaning individuals can upload knowledge at will and focuses on the P2P cloud storage market.
EpiK is an E2P model that enables only voted consultants in the field to upload information, specializing in the E2P cloud knowledge graph storage market.
B. Filecoin costs more
Filecoin storage is 10 times costlier than business-grade cloud storage, which is uneconomical; the added value of the EpiK Protocol knowledge graph will increase exponentially with knowledge density, which is sufficient to compensate for the excessive storage prices, which is economical.
C. Filecoin is more affected by forex worth, much less stable
The availability of Filecoin storage is significantly affected by the FIL foreign money price and is risky.
The EpiK Protocol knowledge graph knowledge storage market doesn't require miners to grab orders in actual time, and miners can select to save a duplicate of each data uploaded by area experts at any time to realize computing power.
D. Filecoin is sluggish to download and has poor usability.
In terms of download bandwidth, Filecoin is lower than one p.c of commercial-grade cloud storage and is not sensible; EpiK Protocol data graphs are listed by information gateways and provided to end-users, which is sensible and does not require excessive downlink bandwidth.
There is no such thing as a substitute for EpiK when it comes to security and privateness protection.
The privateness of Filecoin storage is definitely achieved with the assistance of cryptography in centralized cloud storage and isn't irreplaceable.
Epik Protocol are well documented and undeniably untameable on the chain, eliminating the potential of malicious manipulation of the data graph, and are irreplaceable in today’s and tomorrow’s period of intelligence where massive AI devices will need access to the data graph.
In terms of hardware thresholds, Filecoin and EpiK differ when it comes to their necessities for computing energy and information high quality.
A. Different computing energy thresholds
Filecoin requires a minimum of 1T computing power to block, but EpiK allows any miner with computing power better than 0 to take part in blocking without prior disk filling, and bizarre miners can be a part of at any time.
B. Different computing energy consumption
Filecoin Most users’ actual files are much smaller than 32GB, each Sector Size is ready to 32GB, which is a waste of house and consumes a variety of computing energy to generate proofs, elevating the hardware threshold.
EpiK Protocol A lot of the knowledge graph data are small information, and reducing the Sector Size to 8M makes better use of resources and likewise reduces the price of producing Post for miners and lowers the hardware threshold.
C. Different data quality checks
Filecoin has no management over knowledge high quality and generates extra meaningless information.
EpiK Protocol depends on community-voted domain experts to manage the standard of the data graph knowledge, giving miners enough time to participate in mining while updating their own equipment as the info scales, reducing the hardware barrier to entry.
The two have completely different enterprise fashions and totally different forms of storage, and thus additionally differ considerably in terms of advantages, penalty mechanisms, and ranges of participation. Compared, EpiK is more humane and cheap in design.
Categories: None
Post a Comment
Oops!
The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.
Oops!
Oops, you forgot something.